• Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    led crowds in chants of “free, free Palestine” and “death, death to the IDF” [The BBC said:] “The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable … " [Starmer said:] “appalling hate speech.”

    “Free Palestine” is not antisemitic. Criticism of a nation state’s armed forces is not antisemitic. Especially when those armed forces are objectively committing genocide.

    • copd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m sure “death to the IDF” is what some people have issues with rather than “free Palestine”

      chanting death for any group idendity en mass will always be controversial, even if it’s for Nazis

      • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        No, chanting death to Nazi was never controversial. It wouldn’t even be controversial if it was death to the Russian army .

        You are denying Palestinians right to self defense by opposing the chant death to the IDF

        • copd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You’re bubbled, it’s undeniably controversial to chant death to people, especially groups of people. By debating it you agree it’s controversial, do you even know what the word means?

          Please don’t try to say I’m denying Palestinans the right to self defence because I don’t want to chant death to their oppressors. My friend, that’s a wild statement and you should pipe down

          Next you’re going to tell me I’m pro Russia because I don’t agree Putin should be assassinated

            • copd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I never said that, I don’t think that. I have no idea why you came up with that.

                • copd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  How did you go from talking about an English artist performing in England, chanting towards an English crowd about killing foreign army, to asking if I support defending your own nation aganst invaders

                  Do you think I’m supporting the horrors of the IDF because I refuse to stand up and chant death to the IDF?

                  I go to free palistine protests in my own country, I probably do more than most but I draw the line at calling for murder.

                  Extremeism is scary

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I guarantee you can find droves of zionists that say “free Palestine” implies the destruction of Israel and is therefore antisemitic.

  • atk007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    When did IDF become a protected minority group? Is saying “Death to Nazis” not allowed in the UK?

    • copd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ll get downvoted for this but what im about to say is an undeniable fact. Chanting death for anyone is inciting violence and murder, UK governments and police can’t be allowing that, especially as there is no death penalty.

      Yes I know, the IDF incite violence and murder, but does that make it OK to do in UK?

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Did they say “IDF” or “IDF members/staff”? IDF isn’t a person, so maybe it’s more of a metaphorical death, as in dismantle the IDF.

        I dunno.

  • huppakee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    To be honest I had never heard of Bob Vylan before, so the people screaming they should be banned (so they dont become known?) reached the opposite effect, at least for me personally.

    • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve been upping the listenership for kneecap and Bob vylan for about a month now. Saving for hard copies to help support. This all reminds me of the satanic panic that was so common when I was a kid. Such fuckery to suppress an idea.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Happy cake day!

      They didn’t even do the most basic of work to attempt to put forward a front of journalistic integrity. They didn’t give Vylan a chance to respond to the article.

      • Limonene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        They should be more neutral in a non-opinion piece. They quote a lot more people saying pro-genocide things than they quote people saying anti-genocide things. They quoted pro-genocide politicians and pro-genocide BBC staff. They did not give the musicians any opportunity to respond to the article.

        Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza has inflamed tensions around the world, triggering pro-Palestinian protests in many capitals and on college campuses. Israel and some supporters have described the protests as antisemitic, while critics say Israel uses such descriptions to silence opponents

        Let’s consider the two positions mentioned in this paragraph:

        1. Israel should stop committing genocide

        2. Israel should continue committing genocide, and position 1 is antisemitic

        The first position is described as “pro-Palestinian”, as if these protesters support the Palestinian military (Hamas) and want them to win. This is incorrect. These people mostly just want the genocide to end.

        The second position is a shitty opinion, but also contains an overt falsehood. It’s an objective fact that it’s false, and that fact should be reported in the story, but it isn’t.