• MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Not OP, but…

    It’s not always perfect, but it’s good for getting a tldr to see if maybe something is worth reading further. As for translations, it’s something AI is rather decent at. And if I go from understanding 0% to 95%, really only missing some cultural context about why a certain phrase might mean something different from face value, that’s a win.

    You can do a lot with AI where the cost of it not being exactly right is essentially zero. Plus, it’s not like humans have a great track record for accuracy, come to think of it. It comes down to being skeptical about it like you would any other source.

    • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Strongly disagree with the TLDR thing

      At least, the iPhone notifications summaries were bad enough I eventually turned them off (but periodically check them) and while I was working at Google you couldn’t really turn of the genAI summaries of internal things (that evangelists kept adding to things) and I rarely found them useful. Well… they’re useful if the conversation is really bland but then the conversation should usually be in some thread elsewhere, if there was something important I don’t think the genAI systems were very good at highlighting it

      • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Completely agree, those summaries are incredibly bad. I was recently looking for some information in Gemini meeting notes and just couldn’t find it, even though I was sure it had been talked about. Then I read the transcript itself and realised that the artificial unintelligence had simply left out all the most important bits.