• James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    🤞pleasejustpickbazzite pleasejustpickbazzite pleasejustpickbazzite🤞

    I’m going to install CachyOS, an Arch-based distro

    oh god dammit

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I’M FED UP, GOING TO INSTALL LINUX!

      • picks a complicated distro where you really need to read the manual or do some heavy google searches to do gaming *

      I’M FED UP, THIS IS TOO HARD, I’M GOING BACK TO WINDOWS!

      • Aneb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        If you want to use arch for the first time use an already setup distro like Manjaro.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Honestly, Day 1’ers, I’d rather they run Debian, Mint, Ubuntu, or Fedora. There are strong communities that are noob friendly. Go ahead and install Steam, get some games working, get their feet wet. 99% of the time, they don’t need more than basic stuff. Once they’re over being afraid of not being in windows, then start distro hopping to whatever they want.

          • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            I can really suggest Mint for beginners simply because it has an UI for about everything you need somewhat regularly. This means, that you can use GUIs to get familiar and aren’t forced to know your way around the terminal. Its the Ideal beginner Distros (at least from my experience)

            • squaresinger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              That’s exactly it though. For most people using an OS isn’t about using the OS but about getting stuff done.

              I don’t run an OS because I love writing config files and running obscure CLI commands. I run an OS because I want a working browser, text editor, development setup and games. The OS is nothing but a means to an end.

              If I want to tinker, I got dozens of more fun projects in my life than trying to setup an OS.

              And if there’s a good GUI way to do what I need, that’s a win, not a downside.

              To put it differently: Do you want a hackable microwave that you can tweak and modify, where you can swap out the guts at any time, or do you want a microwave that heats your food? Most people are in the second camp, and PCs are just like microwaves a tool to get things done.

              Not being forced to know your way around the terminal is an absolute win. Don’t be afraid, nobody’s going to take your CLI from you. It will always still exist. But dumping on people who don’t want to tinker but want their stuff to work without having to google and read through manuals is just elitism and nothing to be proud of.

    • atmorous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Are you looking for fellow Bazzite users? (I’m one of them)

      Good to meet you brother/sister! We walk a rather lonesome road but glad I stand alongside you

    • wendigolibre@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      CachyOS has been flawless on my S/O’s desktop. From an easy install to plenty of documentation available, I couldn’t have asked for much more. During install, there’s an entire step dedicated to checking a box if you want to play games. (To enable non-free drivers).

      I don’t think it was a poor choice.

        • Mesophar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          They didn’t say it required documentation, they said it had plenty of documentation should you need it.

            • Mesophar@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Damnit, you’re right!

              But for real, I think you misunderstand the point of documentation. Even if something were truly, literally flawless, having documentation would still be a net gain. It isn’t only to fix something when it goes wrong, but explains how things are working. If the only way for something to be literally flawless in your world view is for it to be so self explanatory that an idiot seeing it for the first time still understands it perfectly, nothing in computing can be flawless in that way.

              The pedantry on this point is so unhelpful as to be actively harmful to the rest of the discussion.