• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It reduces the onus on businesses and places it on the government (and this indirectly, taxpayers).

    Better for small businesses to hire and thrive.

    “But I don’t want my taxes to go up!”

    Maybe you just need more tax brackets. Where I live, for some reason, a specialized doctor making $250,000/yr is in the same tax bracket as some C-suit making $900,000.

    I definitely need more tax brackets where I live.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never understood the idea of tax brackets. Why isn’t it just continuous? Computers are calculating the tax now anyway, not like it would be infeasible.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like a nightmare to try to explain to someone. Technically it should work, but practically it might be difficult.

          • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            How would an infinitely adjusting tax percentage be intuitive? Brackets are simple. You pay x% on your income in some bracket and y% on your income in a different bracket. You only need simple multiplication and addition to figure out what you would owe.

            • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A continuous bracket could be defined by a single equation. You’d plug in your income and you’d get out your taxation. No need to look up what bracket you are in.

      • vin@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Could totally do a sigmoid function and just integrate over the income. But the brackets are just discrete approximation of that.