I’d hazard a guess that is the point of the graphics considering the special markings highlighting the fact.

At least read the article bro

Dude was autistic and homeless/alone since he was a teenager. Then proceeded to become a beloved part of the community

🫡

Okay first of all, I’m a lifelong vegetarian german.

Second of all, Mettwurst is most definitely not a qualifier to mean “meat sausage”, it is a certain type of sausage like Frankfurter or Wiener Würstchen.

When people say Wurst or Würstchen it is still understood as a meat sausage unless additional qualifiers are added such as veggie. Sad as it is.

Okay my friend, lets start at the beginning:

• someone asks, in a thread about misogyny, why the british government doesnt instead do something trans related first before caring about the cis women
• i respond with the most common and pragmatic political reasons not to do so
• some twat accuses me of being a bigot over this
• i point out that i merely responded
• the twat doubles down on hostile accusations
• we are here 👈

Can we move on now?

Leave it to lemmy to read everything in the most antagonistic way possible. Really getting fucking tired of this place

Are you trying to prove me right? Lmao

Since i apparently need to justify every fucking grammar choice i made on the shitter, i opted for the terms “trans people” and “women” as a matter of expediency and under the assumption the reader would be making a good faith effort to interpret the words as context suggests.

Also, way to ignore entirely what i said for an opportunity to bitch about phrasing.

Okay in case this was not entirely clear, this isnt my opinion, supposedly evident from the term devils advocate. I was merely illustrating the thought processes involved in making women a bigger political priority than trans people.

Leave it to lemmy to read everything in the most antagonistic way possible. Really getting fucking tired of this place

Devils advocate here:

• trans people are far, far fewer
• trans people are a lot less socially accepted
• trans people are not objectively required for the continued existence of a society and/or country
• trans people make for great social lightning rods because they are so controversial

As for the royal pervert, you know as well as i that nothing will happen in that regard. The man is literally royalty.

I’m just saying, rich men can pick and choose from gorgeous women. Being physically attractive isn’t enough, those dynamics stop working when serious money and/or status is involved. They will choose women who have more going on for them than that, provided they are even okay with a transactional relationship. Rich marries rich.

And then, if you get “in” so to say, you definitely should expect to be reduced to the transactional nature of the relationship. He pays for everything, so you are expected to fulfill the role of a fuckmaid. Once you are no longer as attractive as the other 20somethings looking to land a rich husband he will likely cheat on you and/or just divorce you. With a prenup.

I think the education needs to go further. Being billionaire rich is in itself a huge red flag; and people having this much money should immediately cause others to distrust them on every level because nobody gets that rich from honest work, from paying their employees fairly, from caring about the environment and general wellbeing of mankind.

Being a billionaire should disqualify people from owning and/or having shares in any economical sector deemed essential to societal wellbeing, not to mention from holding any kind of public office or even from exercising any kind of political agenda at all. They’re rich, they don’t need representation. They actually can take care of themselves.

It’s just gonna be a testbed for the inevitable breakdown of democracy and regression into true neofeudalism.

The very few own all the things and the population will be reduced to modern age peasants, owning nothing and working for scraps in the economies owned by their rulers.

So basically as is now, just a bit more honest.