You need a definition. You didn’t define it, and people who hate it rarely define it. If nobody knows what everyone is talking about, then it’s all a waste of time.

So, what do you think it means?

I just read another article saying he caved on this. What is the actual situation?

I think you totally misunderstood what they meant. Take a breath, probably turns out this was just a communication problem.

The hired trolls are only one part of the problem. The other problem – perhaps the bigger problem – is that running scam / spam accounts is a legitimate occupation for people living in near-poverty. They need to put food on the table, and if they can do so by posting MAGA bullshit to get the advertising clicks, of course they’ll keep on doing that.

This is a good example of why everyone should be working to improve the living situations of everyone else in the world, and not just in their own country. It’s not like most people enjoy running scams, but if that pays the bills, fuck it, let the rich Americans sort it out.

Nobody said it would be impartial. It’s not impartial now. Might as well make the propaganda be official, imirite?

"And because Ms. Halligan had no lawful authority to present the indictment, I will grant Ms. James’s motion and dismiss the indictment without prejudice.

That’s a big issue. It should certainly be with prejudice, especially for Comey, because the statute of limitations has run on his actions. A fake prosecutor can’t reset the clock on the statute, can it? That’s not a reasonable legal position.

… However, later language leaves the statute of limitations question open. “I will invalidate the ultra vires acts performed by Ms. Halligan and dismiss the indictment without prejudice, returning Ms. James to the status she occupied before being indicted.” … If that is taken at face value, then the statute wouldn’t get reset.