Highly unlikely. These days, disk space is so cheap that all manner of drivers are provided whether you need them or not. Worst case, you should still be able to boot recovery mode or chroot, as you mentioned.
Just make sure that the disk and boot configuration is the same (uefi, sata, secure boot), else both Windows and Linux may have issues finding their boot files.
Really, then why is there an explicit SMART conveyance test?
It’s to test for damage that may have occurred during shipping.
Yeah for most people that’s not an issue, because they aren’t trying to run 70b models.
Like I said, always has been.
And yes, that’s the etymology: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-nik
So I’m also not sure why they’re reporting space news.
So that’s only in the case of sharing RAM? Because the vast majority of people use Nvidia and Linux without issue, myself included.
It’s a blacklist. You’d just have to use a different domain.
I’d still just give it the interfaces and let it do all the network stuff.
I don’t think you want a bridge in fedora. You probably want to pass the Intel card to opnsense and let it handle all the network stuff.
As always, I don’t recommend virtualizing your router, because it’s a huge pain to fix if either it or the host breaks.
No, it’s worse now. Almost no meat, less veg, more pasta, thinner broth. And what’s still in it is lower quality, like I’m sure the meat is like 49% soy protein.
If you want good soup, you can’t get it in a can. (Except clam chowder. Just don’t get Campbells or Progresso.)
What you’re describing is called gastroparesis, and it’s a serious medical condition, not something that generally happens to people as a response to certain food.
Sort of.
Governments, including France, want to weaken security. Sometimes they intentionally conflate illegality with security. It sounds like that’s what’s happening here, with an assist from the journalist who hasn’t done any investigation.
Apparently dead people waking up happens from time to time. Sometimes vital signs are really hard to detect without hospital equipment.
And usually they do actually check to make sure someone is dead before harvesting their organs.
It’s exactly the same material.
Anything the body doesn’t know what to do with, it excretes.
It happens in python pip too.
Yes, I know, that’s what I meant. These statements are not attributable to a person.
Well, this being the open source community, I would expect most people here to be on the side of respecting the rights of content creators. Like I said, if I write some GPL software, I don’t think Microsoft should be able to disrespect my license just because they’re also disrespecting everyone else’s license too through automation at scale.
Edit: forgot to mention, since their product is wholly dependent on the other works, that’s the very definition of a derivative work. While you could argue it’s transformative, it certainly fails the other tests for fair use.
Why would it be an expansion? If you’re using someone else’s work, why wouldn’t you need a license? If I write a book and publish it under CC-BY-NC, should Google be allowed to take my work for their commercial product without compensation or even attribution? Should Microsoft be allowed to create closed-source commercial Copilot off GPL source code?
Though I didn’t see the link to any repos or anything for confirmation.
“oops I accidentally introduced a bug that caused it show up, my bad, I’ll fix it riiiiiiiiiight after my break”