• Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Did she have a naked guy and a naked woman there? Was she expecting him to have sex with people in front of her? In a public restroom? Is there an official government ID card that proves you are “bi”? He should have asked her to prove she was actually a journalist.

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just stepping aside all that’s wrong. What kind of test did she have in mind? An interrogation? In a public bathroom during an event?

  • Sparrow_1029@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Can we just leave people alone for fuck’s sake. What’s this reporter’s malfunction that it matters so much that someone is bi? Is it hurting you? Are they affecting anyone else by existing? Just let people find love and be happy.

    “I need you to prove it to me”

    Get fucked

  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It sounds to me like she was sexually harassing him.

    I am not bi, but I wonder if bisexual people didn’t get the worst name for their sexuality. Because I suspect that most of them simply don’t care about the other person’s gender. I think they’re attracted to the person themselves, regardless of gender. And now that people accept that there are more than two genders, the “bi” in “bisexual”, meaning “two” seems overly specific.

    But anyways, back to the example at hand, assuming that his type of “bi” means that he cares about other stuff more than gender, it’s hard to imagine a worse way to come onto him than to do what that lady did. “I have a terrible personality, now let’s see that hard dick.”

    • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Not an expert, but I’ve always understood that what you’re describing is pansexual. I’ve understood the bisexual is general attraction to both men and women. Pansexual is attraction to any person.

      Again, give or take any given person’s own chosen labels and attractions that might vary.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I always describe pansexuality as “bisexuality with more politics and an ugly flag”. The basic idea is the same (not being attracted only to one gender) but pansexuality is more explicit about there being more than two genders and liking most or all of them.

      • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ve heard that. I’ve heard bi used to mean you’re attracted to more than one gender but not all. Also heard and used it interchangeably with pan.

        I say this as someone who’s pan and called themselves bi for most of their life.

        So long as you can communicate the sorta people you wanna fuck I think that’s the important part.

        • vortic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It seems like, while labels are important for communication, they are just unable to capture all of the nuance when it comes to sexuality and gender.

          • Robaque@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            After all, that’s how all labels work (and perhaps even words in general?). They try to capture meaning, at best failing to do so (endlessly “approaching” it, always a step behind the evolution of language), and at worst ensaring peoples’ thoughts and ideas.