A Somali U.S. citizen, Mubashir, was arrested by federal immigration officers in Cedar-Riverside Tuesday during a mass enforcement.

In the video, a federal officer is seen putting Mubashir in a choke hold and forcing him onto his knees in the snow as he was on his way to get food. Mubashir said he told officers multiple times that he is a U.S. citizen and asked if he could show them his I.D. Officers ignored him, dragged him in the snow and pushed him into a car as witnesses yelled and blew whistles, according to the video of his arrest.

    • Blade9732@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, it is not. The people have failed.

      Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

      Oath of commissioned Officers: I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. (Title 5 U.S. Code 3331, an individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services)

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, it is not. The people have failed.

        That’s a contradictory statement. The constitution is null and void if “the people” have failed to uphold it. The constitution isn’t self evident, nor is it enforceable or interpretable by any single individual. It’s a social contract defined by the courts and enforced by its martial arm.

        When you swear an oath to uphold the Constitution you aren’t swearing to uphold your personal interpretation of the Constitution. You are swearing to uphold the legal definition of the Constitution, inpreted by the supreme court. A court which has made it pretty clear that prior interpretations no longer really matter.

        • Blade9732@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yes. I understand that. I also understand that the supreme Court does not interpret the constitution, they apply the constitution to laws. They are not some God-like Watchtower society, and when they stray, they Must be impeached. We, the people, elect our representation in Congress and are at fault for all of this. I grew up in a military family and was myself a servicemen. I was always taught that the 2nd was put in place to protect against tyranny, but those same people have failed and are quite fine with tyranny as long as it is against “others”. In my opinion, they are traitors. Many of the liberals or Democrats are also at fault. We have elected spineless representatives and allowed this to go on for far to long. This country needs a progressive party to survive, or the nationalists will forever destroy it.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            the supreme Court does not interpret the constitution, they apply the constitution to laws.

            That’s a pedantic dispute, they interpret the constitution when applying their understanding of the constitution to laws.

            They are not some God-like Watchtower society, and when they stray, they Must be impeached.

            Theoretically that would be nice, but getting two thirds of the Senate to agree on anything is unrealistic.

            We, the people, elect our representation in Congress and are at fault for all of this.

            Eh… We don’t exactly have a direct democracy, and the bicameral nature of our representative government was created to empower conservatives. This was made even worse by the Great Compromise.