• Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The energy requirements for storing one ton of co2 are many many times higher than the energy gained from generating one ton of co2 (by oil, gas, coal or biofuel).

    So each MWh spent “storing co2” would be ten times more efficient if used to offset oil extraction to get one MWh less out in the first place.

    This is wasteful greenwashing. If it wasn’t, we’d have broken physics on the level of making perpetual motion machines.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s true but even if we switch entirely over green energy overnight, we’ll still have Steel, still have Bauxite refining for Aluminum, etc, still have to melt and reform glass and aluminum recycled containers, etc, etc.

      There are many processes that we really can’t just get rid of, so they will need carbon capture to ensure they’re not hurting the environment.

        • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Developing the technology now is still useful. Waiting until we’re carbon neutral before even thinking about capture would also be mistake.

          • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Lol I love that you think we’ll actually get beyond carbon neutral at some point. You’re far more optimistic than me.