• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There is a big difference between “anger issues” and having demonstrated that you have so little control of yourself when you’re angry that you assault/murder someone. Those in the second category should not be allowed to go about unsupervised until they get their shit together. I’d say the same thing about children and people with mental health issues that prevent them from being responsible for themselves. I’m not saying control isn’t appropriate here. I’m saying it’s not sufficient.

    • Leg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I actually wasn’t referring to this case when I mentioned anger issues. I used it as an example of a common trait that a person can have while also wielding a weapon, which is insane to allow. Obviously someone who demonstrates the capacity to harm others shouldn’t have firearms either. But it shouldn’t even need to get that far to begin with. Sounds like we agree on this point.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Well there’s a spectrum to anger issues. I have anger issues but I’m not violent or even verbally abusive. I keep it below the surface. I’m just almost constantly pissed off and have a hard time shutting it down.