iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agoIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comimagemessage-square135linkfedilinkarrow-up1104arrow-down114
arrow-up190arrow-down1imageIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comiamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square135linkfedilink
minus-squareAzzu@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoNode does not require an excessive amount of resources.
minus-squareCarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 hours agoBut why Node? Node cost five seconds just to start up back when I worked on my embedded ARM v7 platform, and on modern x86_64 computers, npx anything takes just as long. Why rely on another runtime? Why not native binaries instead?
Node does not require an excessive amount of resources.
But why Node? Node cost five seconds just to start up back when I worked on my embedded ARM v7 platform, and on modern x86_64 computers,
npxanything takes just as long. Why rely on another runtime? Why not native binaries instead?