

On average that’s the male experience. It’s genetics. Not for every individual as you clearly understand, but population statistics are pretty telling that there are huge differences between development and behaviors.


On average that’s the male experience. It’s genetics. Not for every individual as you clearly understand, but population statistics are pretty telling that there are huge differences between development and behaviors.


Could easily be hybrid… You pay some up front, they get some on the back end. This and other subsidies might be able to save the arts.


There is no way this is more viable than a manufactured micro needle, nor scalable.


So not very long at all /s, not that it shouldn’t be a word, but rather, why complicate the legal system needlessly when such systems rely on relativity, clarity, and consistency. Outside of that context we can have 10000 words for it.


I see no reason to make a special specific word as every category needs this…
They should just add modifiers to the category: Assault for instance can get aggravated and hate crime as adjuvants. Murder has manslaughter and degrees and could have hate crime modifiers.
This is a more fair and clear generalized solution of core concepts than entirely new specific categories.
Well first, it’s not necessarily the case it should be changed. No doubt we don’t fully understand, since we don’t fully understand how brains work. There may be very good reason we evolved to be the way we are, as it’s very possible that a single type of person cannot make the overall society successful as a whole. It also doesn’t mean our current systems work for everyone. It may mean that on average, we’d be best to have 2 different school structures to suit more types of people better. And no matter what, nothing can work for everyone. There will alway be outliers.