

In theory: no.
In practice: spineless fuckers like Gavin Newsom will follow through it, save for doing some bare-minimum pornographic deepfake bans the corporations will agree on, and will still allow non-pornographic deepfakes.
He/Him | Hu/En/some Jp | ASD | Bi | C/C++/D/C#/Java


In theory: no.
In practice: spineless fuckers like Gavin Newsom will follow through it, save for doing some bare-minimum pornographic deepfake bans the corporations will agree on, and will still allow non-pornographic deepfakes.


Do scalpers get doxxed regularly?
Because if not, we live in a really bad world.
At least it won’t be like that infamous Hungarian teacher
There was some engineering professor in Hungary, who was convinced rape did not exist and women just made up to control men, and used a shot glass to prove it, by asking his students to try to put their fingers into it while moving it around quickly. Allegedly, just before he got fired, someone took a toy gun in for that analogy, then his head got red and stopped his analogy.
The double deckers are an example of a ready-made solution in the original language’s standard library, the lower one is getting multithreading working through the C ABI bindings, using some 3rd party solution, all while multithreading a lot of other tasks in the application.
Nah, those are double deckers.


You don’t hate AI slop enough…


Okay, it seems like SDL does actually use EV_SYN for signaling reasons.


Did some digging iin those libraries, apparently all just using the standard read() function instead of the libevdev one, and I have yet to see anything about EV_SYN, maybe this way you don’t have to bother with it.


Efficiency-obsessed weirdos don’t understand redundancies. All they see are inefficiencies, and think people can just make up for them in harder times by just “working harder”, which for these weirdos just become a new baseline for even more cuts.


What MAHA is thinking about this?
Advertising, and Apple buying up some professional software to discontinue their non-Apple versions (as well as disabling customization as “they know better than the users”) made it equal with “professionalism”.
Replace the macbook with a beaten up Thinkpad with 4th-5th gen Intel CPU, then it’s more realistic.


How much you’re betting that this will lead to AI being added to many things, to then remove any and all regulations from them?


Okay, then why we need to use a language that has more in common with OCaml? What about using a better C instead?


Functional: car, but without moving parts.
cocAIne