No. You missed the appeal to the absurd that was the basis of my reply.

So in order to combat the notion the soup is for poor people … Campbell’s announces price increases?

I think a better law would be more generic in defining what defined group targeting.

Why only protect one group? How many other divisions will there be?

How balkanized will you make the law when ypu apply it to people?

Will more wealth entitle you to more protections?

Because some people want to use climate as a weapon.