No I’m wrapped up in reality: carbon.

Ok I really have to peace out of this. Just like the other guy who talked to you said: you aren’t absorbing anything.

And in greater numbers.

I heard it was because they used VPNs! (/s if needed)

This is the thing with right wing talking points, they draw a connection between the main issue and one singular point that contributes to it. Then they talk incessantly about that one point while ignoring everything else that causes it  Oh btw, the one point just happens to allow them to scapegoat "the other"^TM for the whole issue.

This is exactly what you’re doing. Down to a tee.

You draw a connection between coal (“majority source”) and carbon. Then you talk incessantly about coal as if that’s the only cause. You give a cursory head nod to oil, and then right back to coal (the one singular point). Right back to ignoring CARBON (the actual issue). All so that you can scapegoat China (the other).

You forgot India this time, because when you see it’s #125 on the list it’s ridiculous to blame them. What else, you continue to ignore per capita CARBON, see previous link.

You’ve proven you’re just regurgitating Fox points. Ciao.

They don’t care because they’re rich. Better than the poors.

Yes that’s why I said “I wonder if they can use that she and other methods to get the population down to zero.” Zero means eradication.

Spaying and neutering and releasing is more effective because then they still compete for the same resources, pushing reproduction down. I wonder if they can use that she other methods to get the population down to zero.

China is number one carbon emissions and coal powers 60% of their grid. This is my career.

Just keep on those Fox points there. Now you’re ignoring mfing population. I worked it out, China has 4.08x the population. Over 4 times the population and you want to ignore that, teehee of course. And right back to coal only, ignoring the actual thing that matters: carbon. You’re really just proving my point that you’re regurgitating Fox points.

Good thing you can ignore everything else polluting the Earth. JFC. And just coincidentally spout Fox’s line. JFC. And ignore the actual problem of fucking CARBON. JFC. “Teehee the US just has too many electrical luxuries teehee, I’ll just ignore the HIGHER CARBON teehee.” JFC.

I don’t believe you for a second. Any rational person would look at the actual issue of carbon.

Ok I’ve had fun so I guess I’ll try to educate you.

You’ve fallen for right wing talking points blaming China for climate change. Notice how they hone in a singular talking point while ignoring everything else? They don’t talk about carbon, they try to take a singular point coal.

Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita

Sort by emissions per capita and see where countries line up. US #16, China #25. India #125.

That’s not to say that coal is fine. But when you hone in on that singular talking point and blame CHINA and oh yeah INDIA bad countries why are they so bad bad bad, then you’ve fallen for right wing Fox news screaming “CHINA’S COALL!”

PS watch for them blaming cement use too, which of course developing countries will use more of.

You forgot the cement use!! CHINA BAD FOR USING CEMENT!1!

Yeah China bad bad bad bad bad! CHINANNNAA!!

Don’t forget China needs to stop using cement! We can use it though of course.

And all those 3rd world countries aren’t allowed sidewalks!

No one’s willing to go first and put themselves at a competitive disadvantage. It needs to be uniform action. And without the US willing to participate it’ll be as slow as molasses.