A new feature meant to boost transparency on Elon Musk’s platform relies on data that researchers say can be inaccurate or easily spoofed.

Advocates for transparency on social media cheered this weekend when X, the app owned by tech billionaire Elon Musk, rolled out a new feature that disclosed what the company said were the country locations of accounts.

The feature appeared to unmask a number of accounts that were portraying themselves as belonging to Americans but in reality were based in countries such as India, Thailand and Bangladesh.

But by Monday, the effectiveness and accuracy of the feature were already in question, as security experts, social media researchers and two former X employees said the location information could be inaccurate or spoofed using widely available technology, such as virtual private networks (VPNs), to hide their locations.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I don’t like how there’s a bunch of misinformation mixed into this whole situation. Lots of fake accounts got passed around as legit ones.

    It almost feels like an exercise in sowing confusion and muddying the waters to me.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah Xwitter has shut the feature off temporarily so that the accounts that were exposed by it can set up VPNs and look like they totally come from the United States and not the countries that they were discovered to have been coming from.

  • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Well now that it got out in the open, I doubt troll accounts will get caught off guard like that again. At least not the smart / state sponsored ones

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I mean if it’s based on the time of creation it would to me that’s the idea of it though. IE the troll accounts that have spent 5 years building up a following, the only way to salvage them if their creation location was bad, is to delete them and start a new one from a VPN in the country they are supposed to be from. At which point smart people are going to note “the wave of accounts made in 2025-2026 and note that timing”.

      Course unless Elon works to change that rule, not tie in the original country etc, or make a blue checkmark feature “anti-doxing” to protect your private information like country.

  • heavyboots@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Honestly, I would be very much down to see this on Lemmy too. “This account was registered from country X” “Last post from country Y” (Or alternatively, “Last post from known VPN” so you at least know it’s happening.)

    It adds some interesting context at the very least.

    • survirtual@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Did you know Americans (and other nationals of any country) also live in other countries? Personally, I could be in several different countries at any given time, not accounting for VPN use.

      The feature doesn’t reveal much.

      That said, I also support the feature because it is data held by privileged users already. Make all privileged data public. No one should have more rights than anyone else, besides the greater rights we have over ourselves.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I travel constantly and use Lemmy. I don’t know what I’d do if someone attacked any opinion or statement I made because of the country I posted from. Have to explain each time why my IP says whatever country?

        • survirtual@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Right. It is a bad mechanism if used for that purpose.

          The correct way to do what they actually want is to have a global, anonymous nationality verification. There are all kinds of ways to do this that aren’t dystopian. Then, if desired, there can be attestation to nationality without disclosure of personal information.

          That would allow us to appropriately measure the national origins of content, and I could see the use of that.

          Instead, people are supporting a deeply flawed mechanism as “good enough,” as they always do. It is lazy, sloppy, and dangerous.

          To that end, if it continues to go that way, there are countless ways to undermine it. That’s also what makes it so stupid. Dishonest actors will easily circumvent it, and honest actors will once again be left suffering.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Did you know Americans (and other nationals of any country) also live in other countries? Personally, I could be in several different countries at any given time, not accounting for VPN use.

        So what? So for every 1 in 100 times an “American” account is revealed to be posting from overseas it’s actually an American? 1% false positives, I’ll take that, fine. This still seems useful to me.

        • survirtual@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I already said it is useful to know. It isn’t useful to take drastic action with, however.

          “That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer.”

          • Benjamin Franklin
  • big_slap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    did not read the article ywt, but I have this pic floating around in a group chat im in, no idea if its true but lmao

    • chuckd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      My theory: I doubt Musk had any hands on direct control in the decision. If he did, the feature would probably still be active. My guess is one of the developers quietly pushed the update because, looks around, reasons. It was reversed so quickly I have a feeling Musk was blindsided like most of us.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I bet, musk demanded a thing, was told it would be a bad idea, he fired that guy, the next guy just does what he says, musk is completely shocked that the entire movement telling him he’s cool were just foreign psyops and he ordered it shut off. Fired the guy who listened to him, for good measure.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        “oops I accidentally introduced a bug that caused it show up, my bad, I’ll fix it riiiiiiiiiight after my break”

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If he did, the feature would probably still be active.

        I have a feeling he would never approve it to begin with.