I am standing on the corner of Harris Road and Young Street outside of the Crossroads Business Park in Bakersfield, California, looking up at a Flock surveillance camera bolted high above a traffic signal. On my phone, I am watching myself in real time as the camera records and livestreams me—without any password or login—to the open internet. I wander into the intersection, stare at the camera and wave. On the livestream, I can see myself clearly. Hundreds of miles away, my colleagues are remotely watching me too through the exposed feed.

Flock left livestreams and administrator control panels for at least 60 of its AI-enabled Condor cameras around the country exposed to the open internet, where anyone could watch them, download 30 days worth of video archive, and change settings, see log files, and run diagnostics.

Archive: http://archive.today/IWMKe

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    iirc they weren’t even the first ones to discover this because there was already someone on the blackmarket selling data collected from exposed cameras and endpoints which included PII of entire police departments.

  • modus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Is there a directory of these cameras? Or are they gonna make me do all the legwork?

  • BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I was living in a 10th story penthouse apartment as a new building started beside us. The contractor put a webcam high up on the structure so people could watch construction live on a website. They left the control panel fully exposed so all you had to do was find the IP address of the camera and boom, you had full control. I would point it directly at my apartment’s window and wave, or my friends would do silly shit. Every morning the cam would be reset, but they never actually secured it. That’s when I realized how fucked we were, 20 years ago.

  • Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Honestly? Good. These cameras should either be public or dismantled. I’d like to see them dismantled, but worst case scenario is the current one where they’re selectively used by law enforcement

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I seem to recall an early 00s screed, perhaps by Bruce Schneier or someone of that ilk, suggesting a future in which yes we have surveillance in the public square, but since it’s public, everyone has full access to all the public-place cameras at any time. So you could use it to, say, see around the corner of an alley at night.

  • excursion22@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Benn Jordan did a recent video on his…explorations of Flock cameras. Essentially, they’re easily hackable and really should be an urgent matter of national security.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Dude, he just released another one where they accessed dozens of real, currently in use cameras. They didn’t even “hack” them, they just used a search engine to find publicly exposed cameras, opened their unsecured internal web panel, and could download and view any footage over the past 31 days, including from the new face tracking cameras that zoom in and pan on people’s unsuspecting faces as they walk by.

      Truly wild.

      • tooclose104@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This only serves to justify my secret low key paranoia that my like is like The Truman Show… I wish my parents were better about limiting some of the movies I was allowed to watch growing up… Arachnophobia was another lasting damage banger…

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Reading flock their own response about their security and recording it via one of their active and installed cameras was fucking great. I mean, it was nightmare shit, but at a certain point, you have to appreciate the irony.

        • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          My own mother (pensioner) sent me the video asking “is this real?” But could only follow the first minutes of it.

          I lol’d at that part and had to explain the brilliance of it. Then she lol’d, too.

          It’s nice to share in the shadows humor, as a family, while we feel our liberties erode.

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        All that and they can’t catch real criminals, gotta harass “illegals” and law abiding citizens for speeding a little.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You can bet your ass foreign spy agencies are laughing their arses off about this as they track whatever targets they like

  • jmsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Snip their wires, spray paint their lens, or put a hammer on the end of a tall stick. it should be easy to take these things out. Of course don’t do anything or have anything on you that would identify you were in the area at the time of these actions.

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The idea that you’re somehow not entitled to privacy based on the publicity of a space has got to be one of the most successful propaganda campaigns used to strip privacy against the will of people.

    Fuck you, I want to take a walk and generally travel freely without being tracked by some fucking “Flock” or Ring camera, or uploaded unblurred to some randos Instagram where Meta and Clearview will train facial recognition and generative AI, or having my entire life story and biometric data collected at some airport.

    Take me back to the thousands of years humanity existed without obscenely invasive tech.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It reminds me a little of Game of Thrones, where all the major players, the royals etc all have spy networks. This is a world where very poor peasants and servants are everywhere and many of them, including children, end up in the employ of this person or that person, watching who is coming and going and reporting back, such that one’s movements and meetings are trackable to a minute degree. The better your spy network, the more power you have.

      Of course Varys, spymaster to the crown, is famed for the effectiveness of his network, which spans the continent and even across the sea to other major cities.

      He himself is a master of disguise. This was left out of the show entirely but he frequently appears by surprise, whipping off the guise of an old woman and later leaving the scene dressed as a priest, etc. He grew up with actors and uses makeup and costume changes to hide his tracks. He can change his voice and gait at will and routinely shocks people by his ability to blend in and appear or disappear at will. He knows how to leave a place by a different entrance than he came in, and knows all the secrets passageways of the castle.

      Basically, in a world with no privacy, the world’s foremost surveillance master is a model for all of us in these times. If you want to move freely in public but do so without a trace, be prepared to pull your hood up and when you leave a restaurant, take off the hoodie you were wearing when you went in. Practice different postures to throw off gait tracking.

      You don’t have to like it, but this is the world we live in.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s the “common sense” part of the laws.

      A honest person has right to live without being tracked. You shouldn’t care how they’ll do it and you shouldn’t care if they go out of business.

      And of course you shouldn’t fear to be public about it and demand answers, LOL, the most notable for me personally part about today’s politics is that in English-speaking countries that fear seems to have become a thing. Well, because any protest that’s more than a demonstration is becoming dangerous and costly.

      While literal legalism always helps tyranny.

      It’s not much different from USSR in the 70s and 80s, “yeah, you can have all your rights, a defendant and all, and correspondence and you won’t be tortured for submitting a complaint, and Soviet laws will be followed to the letter, but good luck, prove you’re not a camel”.

      Since USSR and western nations no longer exist in the same time period, it’s easy to discard even the thought that the latter are gradually becoming similar to the former in some regards, and might even overshoot it.

      Anyway, I live in Russia, here things are for the last few months at the point where I can get jailed for writing even this, just because. LOL again.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        A honest person has right to live without being tracked.

        The implied corrolary here is that a dishonest person doesn’t have this right? How is one determined to be dishonest?

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure that the “non entitled to privacy” part was not about getting organisationally stalked, but that if someone were to randomly take a picture outside and post it somewhere, then you don’t get to make them take down photos.
      Also, if you are creating a scene in public, other get to film you as they get to see you.

      This is not a problem about privacy in public. This is a problem of:

      • organisational stalking
      • misrepresentation of actions
      • shirking accountability and responsibility
  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    18 hours ago

    A city in the KC Metro just signed a contract with Flock for drone cameras. Fuck that Big Brother bullshit.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        red light cameras - at least in australia - are stock standard canon DSLRs… they take images, but not video

        there are some newer ones that do things like photos of people using their phones stopped at lights etc, but generally speed/red light and “single purpose” cameras will just be doing stills, and wouldn’t be too useful for anything other than a single photo when the sensor triggers it

        • Funky_Beak@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          WA police just introduced cameras that recored the inside of a vehicle (including the backseat so yay to childrens privacy) and using AI deternine whether you are driving dangerously.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            yeah they do certainly exist, but bog standard “red light cameras”… ie single purpose cameras are not that kind of problem… imo, as long as they’re deployed to combat actual issues they’re very much a beneficial tool

            i think it’s important to differentiate these new kinds of cameras from the single purpose cameras so that arguments against them can be made independently

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 day ago

    Again? How insecure are these things? I am honestly wondering how easy it would be to get into one and shut down the entire system.

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I studied coding for a while (and it has been a while since I punched in code), but I never coded a virus. I am hesitant to ask an LLM to do it since I have no idea if it’ll work, and I also need to test it to see if it works first. Not sure if I have any sacrificial electronics to do that.

    • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s obvious that these guys are fucking amateur hour Techbros, running this shitshow as they have. I don’t doubt they’re underpaying and undertraining the contractors they hire to install these things.

      • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        If anything, they might have written most of the infrastructure using LLMs. It’s easier for vibecode to forget about security because LLMs often forget context or hyperfixate on the wrong features.

        • M137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 day ago

          The original is better because no higher resolution version actually looks like the original. It’s so weird, it’s not hars at all to make a higher res one that’s almost identical to the original yet all the ones I’ve seen just look like shit. I’m gonna take some time tomorrow and make a high resolution version with the details correct.

          • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I don’t think it’s an upscale. I think it’s an mspaint recreation. There’s no reason an AI upscale would turn the cheek circles into ellipses and move them away from the edge of the cheek. All the colors are also different, and the geometry differs in places too.

          • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 day ago

            The high res one looks better as a cutout instead of the full background, but the jpeg adds to the charm IMHO.